Zero based budgeting (Financial Administration)


CREATION

This technique of budgeting was developed by Peter Phyrr and was first implemented at Texas Instruments in the 1960s.The then President Jimmy Carter introduced this Budgeting system in USA

STATUS IN INDIA

In India, the System was first implemented in the Department of Science and Technology in the year 1983. The need for zero-based budgeting was also emphasized in the seventh five-year plan. However not much has happened on this front since. 

What actually is Zero Based Budgeting ?

Zero Based Budgeting (ZBB) is a technique of making plans and taking decisions, which overturns the working procedure in traditional budgeting. In case of Zero Based Budgeting, the function of each and every department is analyzed and evaluated in a comprehensive manner, and all expenses increase only after such approvals. When discrepancies arise, Zero Based Budget requires detailed justification from every divisional manager, starting from the lowest levels, called the Zero-base. The Zero-base is however, least bothered about the overall increase or reduction of the budget. 


How is it different from the generally used incremental  budgeting technique ?

Zero Based Budgeting (ZBB) is basically a tool for financial planning. In traditional incremental budgeting, only the increase over the previous year?s budget and actual expenditure is required to be justified whereas in ZBB every activity and function is required to be comprehensively reviewed and requirement of funds worked out starting from the Zero-base, which may eventually result in increase or decrease over the previous year’s budget. 

Why should it be implemented in India ?

The system of zero-based budgeting, if adopted by the Indian government, would be beneficial in several ways considering the cost overruns, inefficiency, resource crunch and corruption in the government departments. The functioning of zero base budgeting involves justifying each and every item of expenditure.


What are the advantages and disadvantages of Zero Based Budgeting ?


 Advantages 
 Disadvantages


  • The wasteful and unnecessary expenditures of the government agencies can be identified and eliminated.
  •  The paperwork involved in zero-based budgeting has been found unmanageable by most organisations.
  •  It improves the fiscal position of the government by increasing efficiency.
  •  It is difficult to complete review and analysis of all the expenditure within a limited time frame.
  •  It helps to channelise monetary resources from low priority to high priority areas.
  •  Inter-departmental rivalry may crop up if savings of one department are transferred to any other department.
  •  It enhances the accountability and credibility of the government machinery.
  •  Zero-based budgeting will have to be applied separately to plan and non-plan expenditure of the government despite a chance of duplication of expenditure.
  •  It puts a curb on the instances of different departments spending money on same activity.
  •  The whole exercise will be futile if the excess manpower is not retrained and redeployed much like the monetary and material resources. Some part of manpower may have to be retrenched which is difficult in the Indian situation. 
  •  It is also regarded as a greater legislative control over the executives.
  • It detects Inflated Budget.
  • Identifies the absolute source for outsourcing.
  •  There is a lack of availability of trained personnel who are aware of the concept of zero-based budgeting. Training people could turn out to be a cumbersome process. 


What should the Government of India do taking into consideration the these merits and demerits?


Considering the pros and cons of zero-based budgeting, there is a need to implement this method in a staggered manner with constant reviews and analysis to remove its shortcomings. Government should make efforts to ensure that it does not prove to be time-consuming exercise due to heavy documentation involved.

The government in India should try out zero-based budgeting as a Pilot Project in a few departments and constant modifications should be carried out to overcome its shortcomings. The advantages of zero-based budgeting far outweigh the drawbacks. Hence the precedent-driven Indian governments should find out novel ways to implement zero-based budgeting for a healthier economy. 




Some points from the Indian Express article...
Zero-based budgeting is useful 
1.    In 1986, Rajiv Gandhi eager to take India into the 21st century, wished to adopt zero-based budgeting (ZBB). The traditional approach to budgeting is mainly incremental through ad hoc increases over the previous year, whereas ZBB insists on in-depth analysis of the need of each activity.
2.   ZBB is thus an integrated planning-cum-budgetary exercise with the active involvement of managers at the executive level. Significantly, by the mid-eighties, the concept had already been abandoned in the West. Little wonder then that in India little was achieved beyond a few seminars. The concept was a non-starter due to the in-built resistance of various departments.
3.   The Railways is the best suited for implementation of ZBB — with suitable zodifications — not merely because its finances are at an all-time low but because of the inherent strength of the organisation, which already has well laid down procedures for identification of projects after detailed scrutiny.
4.   Today, with ready access to electronic data, software packages can be designed to facilitate decision-making. It therefore makes sense to give ZBB a chance, despite the prophets of gloom.
5.   At the same time, any blind application of the tenets of ZBB without regard to Indian conditions could be self-defeating. The zeal for undertaking the exercise has to be duly tempered with a pragmatic appreciation of ground realities. ZBB should not be oversold, nor expectations be raised too high.

Trivia

Maharashtra government renamed and used it as Development based budget.


National Human Rights Commission

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India is an autonomous statutory body established on 12 October 1993,under the provisions of The Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993. (TPHRA).
http://www.topnews.in/files/National-Human-Rights-Commission-Logo.PNG


 Functions
TPHRA mandates the NHRC to perform the following functions:
  • proactively or reactively inquire into violations of human rights or negligence in the prevention of such violation by a public servant
  • visit any jail or other institution under the control of the State Government, where persons are detained or lodged for purposes of treatment, reformation or protection, for the study of the living conditions of the inmates and make recommendations
  • review the safeguards provided by or under the Constitution or any law for the time being in force for the protection of human rights and recommend measures for their effective implementation
  • review the factors, including acts of terrorism that inhibit the enjoyment of human rights and recommend appropriate remedial measures
  • study treaties and other international instruments on human rights and make recommendations for their effective implementation
  • undertake and promote research in the field of human rights
  • spread literacy among various sections of society and promote awareness of the safeguards available for the protection of these rights through publications, the media, seminars and other available means
  • encourage the efforts of NGOs and institutions working in the field of human rights
  • such other function as it may consider it necessary for the protection of human rights.
  • take suo motu action, if required in a case if the victim is not in a position to access a court.
 Composition and appointment
Sections 3 and 4 of TPHRA lay down the rules for appointment to the NHRC. The Chairperson and members of the NHRC are appointed by the President of India, on the recommendation of a committee consisting of:
  • The Prime Minister (chairperson)
  • The Speaker of the House of the People
  • The Minister-in-charge of the Ministry of Home Affairs in the Government of India
  • The Leader of the Opposition in the House of the People
  • The Leader of the Opposition in the Council of States
  • The Deputy Chairman of the Council of States
The NHRC consists of:
  • A Chairperson who has been a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India
  • One Member who is, or has been, a Judge of the Supreme Court of India
  • One Member who is, or has been, the Chief Justice of a High Court
  • Two Members to be appointed from among persons having knowledge of, or practical experience in, matters relating to human rights
In addition to this, the Chairpersons of the National Commission for Minorities, the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes, National Commission for the Scheduled Tribes, and the National Commission for Women, serve as ex officio members.

The current chairperson of the NHRC is Hon'ble Justice Shri K G Balakrishnan, and the other members are:

  • Hon'ble Justice Shri Govind Prasad Mathur.
  • Hon'ble Justice Shri B.C. Patel.
  • Shri P.C. Sharma
  • Shri Satyabrata Pal
  • Shri Mohammad Shafi Qureshi, Chairperson, National Commission for Minorities
  • Ms. Yasmmen Abrar , Acting Chairperson, National Commission for Women.
International status

The NHRC has been accredited with "A status" by the International Coordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions (the ICC), indicating that it is in conformity with the Paris Principles - a broad set of principles agreed upon by a conference of experts on the promotion and protection of human rights, in Paris in October 1991, and subsequently endorsed by the UN General Assembly. The Commission is thus entitled to participate in the ICC and in its regional sub-group, the Asia Pacific Forum. The NHRC currently maintains the global NHRI Forum web portal on behalf of the ICC.

Controversy
A report concerning the manner of which the Shivani murder controversy case was rejected, a case which involved high ranking officials being implicated in the murder of a journalist, opened the organisation up to questioning over the usefulness of human rights commissions setup by the government at the national and state levels.

Source- Wikipedia